The only sensible supporter of AAP is an ex supporter of AAP!

Arun Bhatia who till recently was defending AAP in news hour debates, has left AAP and now exposed inner working of AAP movement!

**********************************************

WHY HAVE I WOKEN UP LATE?

IS IT BECAUSE I WAS REFUSED A TICKET?

Please see my open letter to Kejriwal on my timeline sent long before tickets were finalized. I have mentioned that the law minister should either explain his actions or step down. I have also stated that the leaders of the movement should not run away from the media and should defend the movement. Similarly sometime back I had written to Kejriwal regarding Prashant Bhushan obtaining two govt plots in Noida but received no reply.

I have always defended the movement but on all TV shows I have also stated that corrective action regarding AAP leaders should be taken. If these leaders face allegations they must answer and face the media and its questioning. To defend these people blindly without any clarifications coming from them would weaken the movement and make it no different from the political parties we criticize.

If the movement has to survive, then truth and honesty must prevail and AAP leadership should not be immune from being questioned.

It is because I have raised these issue that I was denied a ticket. The denial has not come as a surprise.

If I had acted only to obtain a ticket I would not have written those letters and nor would I have conceded valid points to TV anchors. Nor would I have said that I was sad to see the AAP chair vacant on the TV debates. All these are recorded actions taken long before the ticket was finalized.

My actions were based on truth and meant to strengthen the movement. I realized that the AAP leadership being what it was might get annoyed and refuse the ticket. But I did not silence myself to obtain the ticket.

AAP made me a member of the executive committee of Maharashtra. I attended three meetings. At the third meeting in Mumbai the question of ‘Chaddar’ collection was raised. This means that at a function or gathering all over the city a bed sheet would be spread out on which people would then put contributions and currency notes. I immediately voiced a strong objection that this was a dangerous practice and would definitely lead to corruption.

For this type of fund collection a very rigid procedure has to be followed of counting money in the presence of panchas or witnesses, sealing the bags, transporting the bags to party HQ and breaking the seals in front of witnesses, maintaining registers etc. It would not be possible to follow this procedures in thousands of places in the city and there would be no control of fund collection. It would open the door for thieves to make money and defame the movement. However my objection was not taken seriously and I was only informed that Delhi will be taking a decision. After that I stopped attending the meetings of Maharashtra committee.

The truth is that the movement does not want tough guys to be included as they pose a risk and people like me might turn out to be whistle blowers who could expose the inner working of the movement.

Breaking India #Expose #AAP #Kejriwal
————————–
Arvind Kejriwal’s NGO Kabir was funded heavily by Ford Foundation. This is surprising that Kabir started getting funds from the very first year of operation.In fact, the Annual return of Kabir suggest that they were granted ord Foundation fund of Rs. 4348036 on 15th July 2005, even before the NGO started operations. Though, the Ford Foundation has removed the data for Kabir from grant data base with an ulterior motive, the Annual Report of the Ford Foundation for the year 2005 clearly mention that kabir was granted $1,72,000 in the year 2005. Here is the link to the Annual report of the Ford Foundation itself. http://www.fordfoundation.org/pdfs/library/ar2005.pdf

What is surprising that Kabir claims to be transparent , but has not made public its foreign grants for the year 2008-9. The search at the site returns “failed’ report http://www.kabir.org.in/indexx.htm . But, the Ford Foundation site reveals it all. Kabir was given a grant of $1,97,000 in the year 2008. http://www.fordfoundation.org/grants/grantdetails?grantid=107117.The study of reports on the Kabir’s website show that the next year also they received Rs. 6075149 in the year 2009-10. But the details have been hidden as Annexures not made public in the name of transparency.

Types Of supporters

On a lighter note , There are 3 types of supporters(in all parties, except for 3rd type) seen now a days :
1. Logically balanced and Flexible :
They are pro-nation people , ready to analyze facts and figures, use their intuition and are healthy enough to acknowledge Good and Bad in both parties .They come to a conclusion, considering the imperfection in all parties, as it is inevitable. They look for best possible alternative considering all the challenges nation is facing. They give constructive inputs for all the parties. (which they support and don’t support.. both.)

2. Emotional and sensible, but don’t respect logic much :
You would often come across comments like : ‘NaMo NaMo’ without any context, ‘What has BJP done?’ , ‘At least He is doing something’, Taking the conversation to whole new direction, Sometimes get philosophical.
These are the traits of this category. They are ubiquitous. They sometimes start defending wrong people in the party as they are true lovers of the party. They forget that they are supporting party for better nation.

3. No Logic , Pure emotion , Ready to erupt on almost anyone :
Popularly known as AAPtards.. They are whole new brand of supporters. Nobody has power to defeat them. They live under a myth that They are modern revolutionaries, but practically don’t contribute anywhere , much.

Common traits are :
Getting personal with people , Leaving the conversation when logic is thrown at them , A weird presumption that ‘Modi is disastrous for nation‘, but when you ask them to see what he has done.. You are Gone… You can’t challenge them. They will bombard you with links, which they think are authentic . They are committed to prove 5% black sheep(Modi) in to 100% black sheep AND simply ignore already 95% black sheep (Congress) , as guided by Sir AK.
I wish you never encounter them.. They can make you CRY.

P.S. : On a serious note, Nation is in dire need of unity.. Bridge the differences.. Participate in healthy discussions.. Make best use of social networking.. and Plan for better India!
Jai Hind !

Fact 1: Yasin Bhatkal, a deadly terrorist and former Indian Mujaheedin Head wanted to do a Nuke Blast in Surat

Fact 2: Kamal Farooqui, said that Yasin Bhatkal was caught by police because he was a Muslim (implying that a terrorist should be allowed to bomb people if he is a Muslim?) And he got kicked out of Samajwadi party for this statement (supposedly the most ‘Secular’ party in India after AAP)

Fact 3: Prashant Bhushan, AAP founder says that IM/SIMI terrorists are innocent and IB has no job in the world but top frame these innocent terrorists

Fact 4: AAP leaders fight legal cases for IM terrorists including Batla House calling the encounter fake which, was quashed by court and Court said, don’t bring religion in cases. A terrorist is a terrorist not Hindu or Muslim. They have also run mercy petition campaigns for the likes of Kasab and Afzal Guru

Fact 5 – Kamal Farooqui met kejriwal and is now seriously contemplating joining ‘Secular’ AAP. Sanjay Singh of AAP confirmed the development

And blind AAP Trolls get offended when I Say AAP is nothing but a moderate/legal face of Indian mujaheedin or Lashkar.

Bhaktas!
You are either smoking something very heavy or you perfectly deserve to be called AAPtards if you take even a bit of offence in me calling AAP not much different than Indian Mujaheedin

The safety Valve Theory..! “ History Repeats itself ”

The birth of congress (AAP) was with a dubious motive; it was started more with the object of saving the British Empire (CONGRESS EMPIRE) from the danger than with that of winning political liberty for India – Unleashing an important chapter of Indian History – The Safety Valve Theory (Sequel 2 ).

The year 1857 (2011) marks the struggle of Indians against foreign rule (SONIA G). It was not a sudden occurrence, but culmination of popular resistance to British (CONGRESS) domination. Ii was crushed, but it did leave its mark on the soils of our great Bharat. Till the INC (AAP) was formed in 1885, there were series of rebellion in Bharat by the sons of this this uncomfortable mother land. These rebellions were broadly in form of Peasants movements, Tribals and Civil movements.The so called intelligentsia class (YOUTH) was drawing sense from these rebellions and those in power/education started raising there voices. The Britishers, too determined to rule India after 1857 realized this and A.O Hume (Arvind Kejriwal) was directed, guided and adviced by the then Lord Dufferin (RAHUL G), Viceroy, to provide a safe, mild, peaceful, and constitutional outlet or SAFETY VALVE for the rising discontent among the masses which was inevitable leading towards a popular and violent revolution. The INC (AAP) will thus become a organ of opposition to real revolution, that is , a violent revolution. The same can be witnessed in the duality of the congress leadership right from Gokhale to Gandhi.
The Congress (AAP) was brought into existence through direct government initiative and guidance and through ‘a plan secretly arranged with Viceroy’ so that it could be used as an weapon for safeguarding British rule against the rising forces of popular unrest and antibritish feelings. The two fold character congress fought and collaborated with imperialism. It led the mass movements and when the masses moved towards the revolutionary path, it betrayed the movement to imperialism. It thus had two strands; strand of co-operation with imperialism against the ‘menace’ of mass movement and leadership of the masses in the national struggle.
The same witnessed with Mountbatten Plans, Indo-Pak partition and Congress stills continues the same philosophy…!

AAP toh SAMAJDAR hein hi….